Picture: TBA Sound: TBA Extras: 
Movie: Picture: TBA Sound: TBA Extras:
(Australian rating); Region Free
The following video bitrate graph was generated by BDInfo 0.5.2:
In the following examples, at the top of each is the full frame (suitably shrunk down) used in the comparison, with a 250 pixel wide detail from the frame underneath. The left side is from the PAL DVD. The image was captured digitally from the disc (using VideoReDo Plus), scaled up from its native 720 by 576 resolution to 1,024 by 576 (to present in the 16:9 aspect ratio), and then, in order to be comparable to the Blu-ray version, from that to 1,920 by 1,080. The detail is from that last scaled version, and has not been rescaled again. The right side is from the Australian Blu-ray (captured using the command-line media player MPplayer). This has not been scaled at all.
Since different applications were used to capture the two frames, I am not normally comfortable comparing the brightness or colour between the two. For those visitors from NTSC lands, generally PAL DVDs are just a touch sharper than NTSC DVDs.
This disc has a rather low average bitrate. Is it as good as it could possibly be? I don't know. But it most definitely is a great deal better than the DVD.
Can you see the woodgrain on the desk? Not on the DVD:
What's Matt Damon thinking? Not a chance of guessing from the DVD:
