{"id":310,"date":"2009-03-30T16:23:13","date_gmt":"2009-03-30T05:23:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/?p=310"},"modified":"2010-01-28T13:28:37","modified_gmt":"2010-01-28T02:28:37","slug":"serenity-re-encode-improves-quality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/?p=310","title":{"rendered":"Serenity re-encode improves quality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/blog\/20090212.htm#20090323-1317\">A couple of posts ago<\/a> I mentioned that the Universal Pictures (Australasia) Pty Ltd Blu-ray release of <em>First Blood<\/em> had an identical video encode to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/he\/bdreviews\/firstblood-hd.htm\">previous HD DVD release<\/a>. I have now checked both <em>Total Recall<\/em> and <em>Serenity<\/em>, which Universal had also sent me. <em>Total Recall<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/he\/bdreviews\/totalrecall-hd.htm#bluray\">as can be seen here<\/a>, is also identical to the earlier HD DVD. I confirmed that by comparing 737 &#8216;I&#8217; frames from each and finding them bit-perfect matches.<\/p>\n<p><em>Serenity<\/em>, though, is very different. I shall write it up in due course <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/he\/bdreviews\/serenity-hd.htm\">in the appropriate place<\/a>. Here, though, I will mention that besides the obvious differences (the Blu-ray has two PIP functions, for example), when I extracted frames and compared them, they were quite different. The &#8216;I&#8217; frames were even in different places for the most part.<\/p>\n<p>The extraction of frames from the HD DVD version fell over after only the first one hundred &#8216;I&#8217; frames. I don&#8217;t know why. So I had a limited number of chances to find matching frames between the HD DVD and Blu-ray versions. But I did manage to find one. Here it is, shrunk down:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 3px;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/blog\/graphics\/serenityframe.jpg\" alt=\"Serenity frame\" vspace=\"3\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Now here is a 250 by 300 pixel detail from that frame, unscaled, and compressed only in the lossless PNG format, with the HD DVD capture on the left and the Blu-ray capture on the right:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 3px;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/blog\/graphics\/serenityhdbdcomparo.png\" alt=\"Serenity HD DVD vs Blu-ray comparison\" vspace=\"3\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The differences are there, but by no means obvious. In fact, I chose this section because it was with the forested hills that the differences were most marked. If you examine them closely, you will see that the dark parts are a little darker on the Blu-ray, and the detail a bit clearer. It&#8217;s as though a fine veil or haze overlays the HD DVD version. But an almost transparent one, just enough to knock the edge of clarity off.<\/p>\n<p>The full PNG frames from which I extracted these details were the following sizes: 2,201,983 bytes for the HD DVD extract, and 2,421,047 bytes for the Blu-ray. In other words, the HD DVD frame was 91% of the size of the Blu-ray frame. That suggests that it was inherently more compressible than the Blu-ray version, given that the application I used employed the same compression parameters (for example, it produces identical HD DVD and Blu-ray PNG shots for <em>Total Recall<\/em>, <em>Corpse Bride<\/em> and <em>First Blood<\/em>). That in turn suggests that there truly is more detail in the Blu-ray version.<\/p>\n<p>I expect to have more up <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hifi-writer.com\/he\/bdreviews\/serenity-hd.htm\">under the review<\/a> in a few days.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of posts ago I mentioned that the Universal Pictures (Australasia) Pty Ltd Blu-ray release of First Blood had an identical video encode to the previous HD DVD release. I have now checked both Total Recall and Serenity, which &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/?p=310\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3,16,13],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":311,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions\/311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hifi-writer.com\/wpblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}