Perhaps I’m just fooling myself

I’m reviewing a bunch of home theatre receivers for Sound and Image and as I go I fill in a ‘feature table’. This is a continually evolving thing in which new features make it onto the table and old ones — ones that are simply expected and will attract adverse comment if omitted — are removed. For the most part these are features the presence of which I confirm.

For example, I use the Oppo BDP-83 to output an SACD down HDMI in DSD format to see if the receiver decodes this all right. If the receiver is getting PCM, then that suggests that the receiver can’t decode DSD and has informed the Oppo, which is then decoding the DSD to PCM.

I also check whether the unit decodes 192kHz PCM. But there’s a problem with this. I can feed this signal to a receiver, but how do I know that the receiver is fully decoding it?

Answer, I don’t, and I can’t. Let’s say it can deal only with 96kHz (lying in the spec sheet), then all it need do is ignore every second sample. There is no way I could tell that by ear — the bandwidth would still be greater than 40kHz, which is far beyond the capabilities of my hearing and my system.

I could try to invest in a 192kHz sound card for the computer, but even this wouldn’t really help. The 192kHz recordings I have are real world recordings, and I’d be very surprised if there is any signal above the noise floor by the time you get to 40kHz, let alone 80 or 90kHz.

So I guess I’ll just have to trust them on this.

Posted in Audio, Codecs, Testing | Leave a comment

Will home movies divide into two?

Via Geoff Forgie, it turns out that Blockbuster, the video rental chain in the United States, has gone into Chapter 11 bankruptcy (this apparently lets them off their debts, but continue trading) owing tens of millions to movie studios.

Which makes me wonder, is video rental a dying industry? Will the rental market move to almost entirely on-line via downloads or streaming (eg. Bigpond Movies), while DVD and Blu-ray become ownership-only deals.

Or if Blu-ray becomes sufficiently popular, will this keep video rental stores going? Bigpond Movies has a bitrate of 1.8Mbps in Windows Media format, which is stretching things a little for high quality SD. It’s going to be quite a while before full HD movie downloads become viable.

Posted in Blu-ray, Business, DVD | 4 Comments

Toy Story Blu-ray comparison & review

In celebration of the forthcoming release of Toy Story 3 on 17 November, I’ve put up my recent review of Toy Story 1 (& 2), along with a Blu-ray vs DVD comparison.

Of course the Blu-ray is markedly better than the DVD, but in general the DVD is pretty good itself. In general. I thought it worth highlighting one of the comparisons, though, where the DVD’s frame was pretty poor:

Now this whole scene has everything moving very fast, which imposes more demands on the compression system because compression by means of comparing frames loses its efficiency when the frames have relatively few similarities.

Normally you don’t see this level of degradation because fast movement means marked smearing as objects move within the open-shutter period of the camera. But this computer-generated scene is razor sharp and detailed despite the movement, thus allowing the artefacts produced by the DVD compression to be visible.

Anyway, there are another five comparison shots at the link.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details | 2 Comments

Playstation 3 now does Blu-ray 3D

Firmware 3.5 adds this. I’ve tried it out on my original model PS3 (40GB — now upgraded to 320GB — 2 USB ports). Monster House 3D works. Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 3D works. A shop demo with several clips of Monsters vs Aliens 3D works. But the proper Monsters vs Aliens 3D disc bundled for a while with Samsung 3D TVs not only doesn’t work, it isn’t even recognised by the PS3. But this works fine in a Sony BDP-S470 Blu-ray 3D player.

Posted in 3D, Blu-ray | Leave a comment

Stuck

Over the years, and two or three thousand product reviews, I’ve occasionally dealt with some physically difficult devices. But this is the first time I’ve been completely stuck.

Last night I dragooned one of my daughters’ boyfriends — a fine young lad of 19 who is in good physical shape — to help unpack the Paradigm Sub2 subwoofer, and carry it the ten metres or so to subwoofer corner in my office. The unpacking went all right. But the lifting didn’t.

Oh, we got it off the ground, and then we put it back down. Twice. The second time was because I couldn’t really believe it was as hard as it seemed the first time. But it was. According to the specs, it weighs 106kg.

We may have managed to get it down to the corner without dropping. Fifty/fifty maybe. But the thing costs $11,000, so even a tiny chance of dropping it wasn’t acceptable.

I bought a trolley this morning. Next time an able-bodied person is handy I shall try again.

Posted in Equipment, Testing | 2 Comments

2012

Characters punched from the same dress-up-doll book that was used for a thousand other movies, and coincidences that make the plot-line of Starship Troopers seem like a model of non-contrivance.

You just know that as the world is falling apart, our heroes are going to survive by mere millimetres. Yet somehow it is quite exciting in parts, and some of the special effects are most definitely impressive.

I have a copy on a test disc — Blu-ray of course, I sneer these days at mere DVDs — which the first to ask in comments (Australian postal address only) may have.

Posted in Blu-ray, Giveaway | 4 Comments

Digital radio in Canberra

I’ve done a piece for Monday’s The Canberra Times on digital radio. In brief, it discusses some of the advantages of digital radio and gives a brief review of audio quality, but it is primarily about the legal complications. According to ACMA, the present trial will conclude on 30 June 2011, its guidelines do not permit extensions of trial periods, and there is no provision in its legislation for the granting of proper broadcast licences for digital radio in Canberra.

In other words, come 1 July 2011 there will be no more digital radio here for some unknown period.

But I also spoke to the CEO of Commercial Radio Australia, and she was confident that, as with Sydney, the trial will be extended with a view to full licensing around 2013.

I do get the impression that there will be some very irritating broadcasters should it conclude in the middle of next year. After all, they’ve gone and bought equipment specially for digital radio.

Anyway, I thought that some information that didn’t make it into the article might be of interest here: the actual broadcast bitrates of the Canberra stations. Remember, digital radio in Australia is using the DAB+ standard, and the audio is encoded in HE-AAC format (High Efficiency Advanced Audio Coding), so it wouldn’t be directly comparable with more familiar codecs. Still, the figures may be interesting. I got the figures from the Onkyo UP-DT1 digital radio receiver. This is a module that plugs onto the proprietary port on Onkyo and Integra home theatre receivers (it sells for $399). It discloses quite detailed information on the OSD when you press the receiver’s remote’s ‘Display’ button.

All are broadcast on channel 10B (211.64MHz). Their bitrates are:

Station HE-AAC Bitrate
104.7 Hit Music 64kbps
2CA 64kbps
2CC 64kbps
Classic Hits PLUS 64kbps
Hot Country 64kbps
MIX 106.3 64kbps
My Canberra Digital 64kbps
RADAR RADIO 64kbps
SBS Chill 80kbps
SBS Pop Asia 80kbps
SBS Radio 1 48kbps
SBS Radio 2 48kbps

Incidentally, while all the stations had some text accompanying their broadcast, it was mostly just some station logo. But SBS Chill and SBS Pop Asia both had genuinely useful text, alternating between the titles of the song ‘Just Played’ and the song playing ‘Now’.

Posted in Digital Radio | 2 Comments

Poor netiquette?

I was just having a little look-see at the stats for my website, and noticed that one pic was being used rather more often than any linking pages. Turned out that there is a live link on some Peruvian page.

Is this naughty?

Posted in Admin | 3 Comments

How black can Epson get?

Yesterday Epson flew me up to Sydney to attend at Fox Studios, well, not precisely a launch, but a briefing on its two forthcoming home theatre projectors. They will be available in November. These are somewhat of a departure for Epson. According to the industry figures it presented, it has a 53% of the total projector market in Australia, and a 34% share of the 1080p (ie. good quality home theatre) segment of the Australian projector market.

Epson EH-R2000 1080p projector

And pretty much all of these are LCD projectors. As are its two new models, but they are still very different, because instead of the LCD panels controlling the light as it passes through them, these ones use reflective LCD panels. Ah, I said, you mean LCoS! But no. Apparently they are quite different to Liquid Crystal on Silicon (which appears most prominently as DiLA by JVC, and SXRD by Sony). According to Epson’s schematic, its panels are pretty much the same as its transmissive ones through the first six layers. It is only when the light gets to the bottom electrode that things are different. Instead of a transparent electrode, a reflective aluminium one is used, sending the light back the way it came.

There are several advantages to this, most obviously a reduced screen door  effect since the wiring and the active parts can be behind the reflective electrode, instead of being squeezed into gaps between the transparent parts.

But Epson says that it has other advantages. In particular, it is able to produce significantly deeper blacks. Apparently the light is first polarised, but the passage through the layers making up the LCD panel scatters the polarisation to some extent, inconsistently depending on the angle at which the light makes its passage.

By travelling through the same layers in both directions, the de-polarisation is considerably more consistent for the different angles, and so can be corrected. That then allows the light to be more effectively blocked by a polarisation filter.

Epson EH-R4000 1080p projector

The net effect is a significant boost of the native contrast ratio of the reflective panel (RHTPS Epson calls it) compared to the transmissive one (HTPS). The native contrast ratio of Epson’s current top of the line model is about 6,000:1. This is pretty impressive, in 2002 the best that LCD projectors could manage was about 600:1.

The lower cost of the two new Epson projectors — the Epson EH-R2000 (prices not set yet, but probably around $AUS5,500) — offers a native aspect ratio of 25,000:1. The more expensive (same deal: ~$7,500) offers 40,000:1. With their dynamic iris operation, they claim 500,000:1 and 1,000,000:1 respectively for full on/full off.

I reckon this is pretty exciting. I’ve been using the Epson EH-TW5500 for many months on a long-term loan from the company, and I’ve thought the blacks very impressive. The $20,000+ Runco LED/DLP was a little better in that regard, but that’s about the only one. These new models should be seriously blacker.

Another cool feature: powered focus, zoom and horizontal and vertical lens shift. I’ve been neither here nor there in the past about having power on these adjustments since they are pretty much one-off settings. But these projectors include memory presets. If you use an anamorphic lens in a constant-image-height system, one of the presets can quickly make the image come out right when the lens swings into place. Having to make manual adjustments has been in the past a significant deterrent to anamorphic lens systems.

BTW, I have a copy of test copy of After.Life to give away. No box, etc. Quite an interesting little movie. First to request in comments can have it.

Posted in Blu-ray, Equipment, Giveaway, Video | 6 Comments

Plasma 3D TV

I have now used six different 3D TVs with Blu-ray 3D discs: four LCDs from three brands, and two plasmas from two brands. And I think I’d be safe in saying that I prefer plasma for 3D Blu-ray.

But it isn’t all one way. Both technologies suffer from irritating crosstalk. But the crosstalk has a different character for the two technologies. So far, from my experience LCD displays tend to show more crosstalk of darker objects on lighter backgrounds. That is, you tend to see a ghost around the darker object against the pale background.

But the reverse seems to be more the case with plasma TVs: darker objects tend to be displayed very cleanly (although not perfectly so) over light backgrounds, but light objects on dark backgrounds tend to have ghosts around them.

This seems to relate to the display technology, rather than the LC shutter glasses. I was previously using a Samsung LCD, and now I’m using a Samsung plasma, and my description above holds for them. But I used the same pair of shutter glasses for both TVs. Not just the same model, but the actual same set of eye wear.

Posted in 3D, Blu-ray | Leave a comment