HDTV vs SDTV again

Australian Idol: SD vs HDLast night one of the Australian Idol judges, Marcia Hines, was wearing this brilliant jacket. Brilliant, that is, from my point of view. That’s because it was white with a strong, very narrow, closely spaced, near horizontal, black stripe. Brilliant test clip, I thought, especially as it’s interlaced, so I captured a section of the video from both the HD and SD versions of the broadcast and produced a beaut two minute clip consisting entirely of Marcia’s jacket, mostly in close and medium distance shots.

I thought that I might as well do a quick comparison, seeing as I had the stuff on my computer. So this is an extreme wide-angle shot. The full frame is at the top with details underneath — standard definition to the left, high definition to the right. As usual, I used Photoshop to increase the size of the SD version from its original 1,024 by 576 pixels (actually broadcast at 720 by 576 but captured in the correct aspect by my application) to 1,920 by 1,080, because that’s what your HD display would do.

There are obvious differences of sharpness and clarity, and in the HD version fewer and smaller random noise blotches, which are compression artefacts. Most interesting to me, though, was the group of people seated behind the singer. On the right hand side you can, if you are familiar with this year’s show, identify them all. On the left you’d be hard put to identify any.

Posted in DTV, HDTV, Interlacing | Leave a comment

Juno ‘Digital Copy’, let’s dig deeper

Let’s dig a little deeper into this whole ‘Digital Copy’ (DC) thing, discussed in the previous post.

My brother, presently holidaying in Austria, has written to me suggesting that I ‘should install a Firefox or Maxthon browser and set up a proxy server to access the DC movies.’ I’m prepared to go to reasonable lengths to find out the information that I need, or to explore the intricacies of some interesting piece of technology. But when it comes to using consumer orientated hardware and software, I play dumb. I try to follow the instructions as best I can. What more can you reasonably ask of the consumer? So I persevere with Internet Explorer. I don’t use proxy servers.

Anyway, I’ve already seen this wonderful movie … twice! On Blu-ray. I highly recommend the movie to readers. But I have no desire to see it on a portable device. I just want to find out if a consumer can if he or she wishes to.

Now, what is this ‘Digital Copy’? The disc it is on is not a DVD-Video, but a DVD ROM. That is, all it contains is a set of computer files and folders. The disc is single layer and carries 2.71GB of data. In its root directory is an ‘Autorun.inf’ file which Windows automatically runs on inserting the disc. This in turn invokes a program called ‘Menu.exe’, a 3MB program which brings the menu up on your screen and manages the installation process.

The actual video data resides in the DVDROM/Media folder. There appear to be three copies there:

Juno_PC_NTSC.wmv
1.09GB — this appears to be the Windows Media format version intended for PC viewing.
Juno_PORT_NTSC.wmv
0.498GB — this appears to be the Windows Media format version intended for portable device viewing.
FeatureMovie
1.11GB — this file has no extension, but it’s so big it is also likely to be a video file, presumably in some format compatible with iTunes and the iPod. iTunes doesn’t pay too much attention to file names in general, so it isn’t surprising that this file doesn’t have a recognisable media extension on it.

Since I was digging around in the contents of the disc anyway, I decided to double click on the first of these. Windows Media Player came up and sought my permission to download some necessary extensions to play the file. I granted permission. Downloads and installations occurred, and then:

Failed playing of Juno WMV I have altered that screen shot only to white out the serial number. Presumably this means that you’re only allowed to get permission to use the material on a given serial number a certain number of times, and somehow in my playing around I’ve exceeded that. But I did try to play the thing in an unconventional way, so let me restart:

  • I Autoplay the DVD ROM to bring up the menu, then click on ‘Transfer Digital Copy’:
    Juno autoplay menu
  • In the box that pops up I click ‘TRANSFER TO WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER’:
    Juno copy manager
  • In the next box that pops up:
    Juno: Enter Serial
  • I enter the serial number and tick the licence agreement box, then click ‘NEXT’:
    Juno: Failed yet again
  • Okay, see the added line of text (once again, I’ve blanked out the serial number, not that it appears to be of much use to anyone)? It says: ‘This asset has already been licensed.’ Which I presume means, like the other one, that I’ve used up the total number of licensings allowed.

So how many licenses are allowed? If only one, then I suppose my first attempt, which led to the apparent wrong-country-denial, counted as an access. What if you want to load it onto both your computer and your iPod? I shall have to ask.

This continues my long tradition of coming unstuck on digital rights management.

Of course, discs sold in Australia should never come a-cropper with the wrong country thing in the first place.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD | Leave a comment

Brilliant Idea, Dumb Name

Well, here I am live-blogging at the Republican National Convention where … okay, hang on, I’m not doing that at all. Instead I’m semi-live-blogging as I attempt to grapple for the first time with a ‘Digital Copy’. In my title my reference to a dumb name is a reference to ‘Digital Copy’.

But it is a brilliant idea. Here’s the thing: you buy a movie on a DVD or Blu-ray. You can watch it on your home theatre system, or on your portable DVD player, or on your notebook computer. But you can’t watch it on your video iPod or other portable video device. Well, actually you can but only by using various naughty tools to rip the movie from the disc and transform it to a suitable format. ‘Digital Copy’ eliminates this need. You get an extra copy of the movie in a format suitable for running on your portable video device.

It’s brilliant for several reasons. First, if widely adopted by the industry it will cut the ground from underneath developers of the aforementioned naughty tools. Second, it’s a useful extra for those who want to be able to view their movies portably. Third, it fits in with the popular sense that once you’ve purchased a DVD, you should be able to enjoy the movie in any format that suits you, the purchaser. Finally, digital rights management is included in this copy, so it’s easier to control than proliferating ripped copies.

But the name is stunningly dumb. ‘Digital Copy’? That’s what the DVD is! How about ‘Movie to Go’ or some such that actually differentiates this feature from a normal DVD.

Anyway, this feature has been available in the US for a while, and will be appearing on some Twentieth Century Fox titles in Australia in the near future: specifically in What Happens In Vegas (22 October 2008) and Shine a Light (5 November). However, as an advance preview of how it works, I (and I assume various Australian journalists) received a copy of the Juno DVD in the mail today. But not the Australian one; the US one. This has a second disc which contains the ‘Digital Copy’. So what I am about to do is semi-live-blog (this won’t be uploaded until I’ve finished, or my mission fails) of loading the ‘Digital Copy’ (hereinafter referred to as DC). So here goes.

  • I open the box. It has one of those stickers across the top that are always on US DVDs, but never on Australian ones. I take Disc One and put it in my computer’s (Windows XP SP2) DVD-ROM drive. It whirs and asks me whether I want to run CyberLink PowerDVD. While it was whirring, I glanced at the box and discovered that the DC was on Disc 2.
  • I load Disc 2 and pretty rapidly a panel appears asking me whether I want to load the DC, quit or get help. Choosing the latter brings up a web page with some instructions. I choose ‘Transfer Digital Copy’. A new panel pops up and asks if I want the iTunes or the Windows Media versions. Since I have an iPod, I choose the former.
  • Then I wait. iTunes has always been horribly slow to load on my computers. Apple ought to get its act together on that. Finally it does, though, and Juno appears as a device.
  • I click on that and the right hand pane of iTunes shows a nice Juno graphic at the top, and underneath tells me to type into the box the code on the ‘Juno DVD insert’.
    Nice Juno graphics
  • Juno DVD insert? Oh, there it is: a slip hidden underneath another, larger, slip advertising a different movie. On the back is a 16 digit, three hyphen code number along with some instructions. I type that it and click on ‘Redeem’.
  • Up pops a box which says: ‘Sign in to redeem your code.’ It asks for my Apple ID and password. Do I even have an Apple ID? Did I get one when I installed iTunes? Should I click on Create Account, or Forgot Password? I try the latter, just in case.
  • Hey, I do have an account! I answer the security questions, correctly, and change my password. Then I return to iTunes, but now it tells me I’ve timed out. Probably not a good idea to live blog and screw things up all at the same time. So I go back and click again on ‘Transfer Digital Copy’.
  • That didn’t do anything, so I eject the disc and really go back to the beginning.
  • I click the appropriate selections as previously outlined. I type in that damned 16 digit code again. This is complicated (as it was the first time, but I forgot to mention it) by the fact that each character I type causes the previous one to become indecipherable. So I have to type very carefully. This is what it looks like:
    Invisible Digital Copy code
  • I click the ‘Redeem’ button and the iTunes website is opened up where I am asked to confirm my information (apparently I’ve never done this before) and accept their terms and conditions. I insouciantly do same, as usual not reading them. Does anyone ever actually do that?
  • iTunes tells me it’s communicating with something, and then the following appears:
    Wrong country it seems
  • I take this to mean that the devious thing has worked out that I’m in Australia, so I’m screwed.

Well, I may try the Windows Media version later, but for the time being testing out ‘Disc Copy’ is going to have to wait.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD | Leave a comment

DVD Dominance

'Batman Begins' Blu-ray boxYesterday Warner Bros sent me the three Dirty Harry sequels on Blu-ray, along with the ‘Limited Edition Giftset’ Blu-ray for Batman Begins. I watched the latter last night and it was glorious. Great movie to begin with, and superb picture quality on the disc. I shall do a proper review for publication in due course. But one thing I ought to mention is that it will not shelve well with your other Blu-ray discs.

The reason for this is that two of the extras are booklets with comic book and script elements. Pretty decent productions in their own rights, they are clearly sized for packaging with a DVD. So the stylish Blu-ray cardboad outer box is also sized for the DVD. Since Blu-ray disc boxes are shorter than those for DVDs and cardboard spacer sits underneath the plastic disc box.

This kind of thing will change once Blu-ray gains a sufficiently large market, I suppose.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD | Leave a comment

3DTV

Back in the early 1970s I entered a $100 bet with a school friend to the effect that before we died some form of effective, commercial 3D TV would be available. A hundred dollars seemed like a lot in those days.

On the face of it, his bet (against the proposition) was safer than mine (for it). Our TVs were all CRTs. The only programming was free to air analogue: VHS had not yet arrived, let alone DVD or Blu-ray. He was more technologically knowledgeable. I had no idea at all how the technology might work. But I bet on this advance on general principles.

If we assumed that we had, say, fifty more years to live then we had a timescale by which to judge likely technological progress. Casting back fifty years would have taken us to the first half of the 1920s. Say, around the time that Philo Farnsworth was inventing the idea of using scan lines as a system for television. Certainly well before magnetic tape was invented. As far as I could see, if things moved that far and fast in the previous five decades, they could move just as far and fast in the next five.

So here we are 35 years later. Late last month Samsung announced that the ‘World’s first 3-D Plasma Is Here!’ (Link to come). Basically, this is a eye-glasses based system, I think with polarising shutter filters. What’s special about the TV is that it incorporates picture processing technology from Perth-based DDD (Dynamic Digital Depth) that allegedly turns 2D into 3D. I’m supposed to be looking at this TV in a few days. It also seems to support dedicated 3D material delivered via computer.

Today I received a press release from Philips indicating that it is demonstrating its 3D system at the Berlin IFA consumer electronics show. What’s interesting here is that in addition to various displays, the company will have a demonstration Blu-ray product. Its approach is called ‘2D plus depth‘, which is different to the more common stereoscopic approach. The Philips system uses a regular image, but there’s a second depth map delivered as well which can be applied or ignored, depending on the capabilities of the equipment. It’s analogous to the introduction of colour to TV, where the black and white image remained the same for backwards compatibility, and the colour overlay could be ignored by black and white TVs.

Presumably we will need a HDMI v1.4 to support this signal.

I’m certainly not claiming (yet) to have won that schoolboy bet, but things are moving in the right direction. It will be interesting to see how well this stuff works. Is it realistic? Does it work for a number of people in the room? At different viewing angles?

And if this technology becomes available, will 3D movie production become as ubiquitous as colour?

Posted in 3D, How Things Work, Video | Leave a comment

VHS Weirdness

Independence Day VHS detail showing combing

Well, there you go. It looks like I don’t have too many readers after all! Or none, anyway, that have any spare VHS tapes. Happily charity came to the rescue. More to the point, I went to the Salvation Army and St Vincent de Paul’s op shops today and found some prerecorded VHS tapes. Brilliant! What I found were Independence Day and Entrapment. I have the first on Blu-ray already and am seeking the latter. These cost me the princely sum of $5 in total. I also purchased The Untouchables because I thought this also was available on Blu-ray, but I was in error.

So I plugged the output of the VCR into the composite video input of my video capture card (no point trying to do this with a DVD recorder because it’s almost certain that the VHS tapes are macrovision encoded) and started recording. I did a little test, first, on a random section of video just to make sure it was all working okay. It was, sort of, but there was heavy interlacing. There was no good reason for that. Except that I remembered that the first DVD release of Independence Day had exactly the same problem. For confirmation I recorded on my computer snippets from each of the other two tapes I purchased, and neither had this problem.

That’s going to slow things up. I am not aiming to compare any specific VHS with DVD and Blu-ray, but rather to do a more general format comparison. That’s why I am also seeking Entrapment on Blu-ray. That means I need to present VHS at its best. So I have to extract the opposite fields from adjacent VHS frames and weave them together myself. Damn.

Even then, as you can see from the weave I’ve done here, there’s still a slight misalignment, that being the nature of VHS. Interframe stability isn’t very high. I tried sliding the two fields a little left and right, but it generally made things worse. That picture has a detail from an original VHS frame to the left, the same section from the next VHS frame in the middle, followed by my manual weaving together of the matching two fields from those frames.

What is amusing is that at the start of this tape is a boast contained in the following two frames:

THX logo on Independence Day VHS

UPDATE (Friday, 22 August 2008, 9:56 pm): The plot thickens. If you read closely my coverage of the interlacing problems with the Independence Day DVD, you will see the following:

Interestingly, unlike the next two movies we shall look at, Independence Day does not have this problem all the way through. It appears in perhaps half of the movie, but there are plenty of scenes recorded properly. For example, most of the airfight scenes look okay. And the scenes featuring Will Smith at his girlfriend’s house before he notices the spaceship are magnificently recorded.

So I get to the section of the movie on VHS featuring Will Smith at his girlfriend’s house, and what do you know? No interlacing! What does this tell us? Well, nothing for certain, but it does seem very likely indeed that the original PAL DVD and the PAL VHS were derived from the same telecine of the film. The masking for the different aspect ratios of presentation (the VHS is in 1.33:1 while the DVD is 2.35:1) must have been conducted after whatever it was that caused the field reversal for large chunks of the movie.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD, Interlacing, Video | Leave a comment

VHS Help!!!

Independently of each other, my brother and my daughter have both suggested that I should do a pictorial comparison of VHS to DVD to Blu-ray. I think it’s a smashing idea and I’ve got the technical capabilities to do it. Except for one problem: I’ve only got a few VHS tapes, and none of them match Blu-rays, nor are they likely to do so in the near future.

So, on the wild assumption that I actually have readers out there, especially Australian ones, do any of you have a pre-recorded VHS tape of any movie that is available on Blu-ray? That you could allow me to have, or at least borrow for a few days? The ideal tape would be of a fairly recent movie (eg. from the 1990s), and one that hasn’t been played to death, thereby allowing a reasonable representation of VHS quality (such as it was). For example, something like ‘The Fifth Element’ would be ideal.

I am in the process of assembling a full list of Blu-ray discs available in Australia, along with a list of forthcoming releases. It is still quite incomplete, but such as it is, it is here.

In the meantime, I’ve done further Blu-ray comparisons on Robocop, Phantom of the Opera and Pan’s Labyrinth. From the last one here is an intriguing comparison, which reveals quite clearly the lower resolution of the colour components in DVD video:

Detail from Pan's Labyrinth: Blu-ray vs DVD

Posted in Admin, Blu-ray, DVD, Video | Leave a comment

And another BD/DVD comparison

I’ve added six comparison shots to my review of Independence Day. Here’s the first one:

Independence Day: Blu-ray vs DVD

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD | Leave a comment

Audio calculations

The editor of Australian HI-FI, for which I write, has just emailed me a link to the most incredible and useful set of calculators I’ve ever seen at Sound Studio and Audio Calculations Online – Acoustics Conversion Engines. Okay, they’re useful if you’re into technical stuff. But if you can’t quite remember what a dBu is, then this is the place to go.

Posted in Admin, General Tech, How Things Work | Leave a comment

Two more Blu-ray/DVD comparisons

I’ve now done comparison shots between the Australian DVDs and Blu-rays of The Fifth Element and Full Metal Jacket. By coincidence, these are somewhat related. The first Blu-ray release of each of these in the United States was heavily criticised. Both have since been remastered and released. In Australia, we only ever had the re-released version of TFE, and the original, low quality, version of FMJ.

Posted in Blu-ray, Disc details, DVD | Leave a comment