Everything online all the time

The Gadget Guy reports that 200,000 pre-WWII recordings have been donated by Universal Music to the US Library of Congress, which will convert them to a digital format and make them available for free online. I reckon this is a valuable service. Old content should be recovered and copied to digital formats while the reading technology remains available.

This would be even more important with magnetic media than mechanical recordings (ie, where a physical representation of the sound vibration is stored). The latter are always amendable to recovery even with custom equipment. But old tapes — especially ones from the early days when little was standardised — are harder to read, especially without original equipment.

Posted in Analogue, Audio, Music | Leave a comment

Keep those fingers under control

Since I got the iPad I’ve been using this really cool facility called dropbox.com to keep the articles I’m currently working on in sync between the iPad and the main computer. You get 2GB of storage for free, and it has been quite transparent in operation.

Last night I was working on an article late, typing it on the iPad. Much to my surprise, when I checked the computer this morning it hadn’t been updated. In fact, the last update was at 3:39pm yesterday. I checked my bit of dropbox.com, and found that the website also only held this older copy. Only after fiddling around and rebooting did I find that somehow the iPad’s date was set to March this year! Then I realised that I’d been looking around in its settings yesterday, trying to find some way of having it automatically sync its time with some Internet time service.  It’s quite possible that I’d accidentally flicked one of the rolling numbers on the setting screen by mistake. Ease of use can sometimes result in ease of stuffing up.

I set the clock to the correct time, and now it works fine. Except that when I check the time on my Windows machine, it also was set to March. So now I’m confused.

Posted in Admin, Computer | Leave a comment

Why we like music remains a mystery

In a comment to an earlier post Treblid linked to an interesting article in Discovery News called ‘Why Music Makes You Happy‘. The article relates a study in which the brain function of a number of people was analysed during the playing of certain loved music. This disclosed that the pleasure centres of the brain received a dopamine hit when the subjects were listening to such music.

As I said, quite interesting.

But it in no way justifies the title. This doesn’t tell us anything much about ‘Why music makes us happy’. What it does is disclose how part of the mechanism by which certain bits of music, previously known to make the listeners happy, works.

Note, I am not saying anything at all about the validity of the substantive claims of the work reported in the article. I don’t know how much dopamine is associated with the things they talk about. So I’m happy to accept it all on face value, tentatively.

But the article doesn’t have anything to say about why some kinds of music prompt this reaction in the first place. Nor why I can get that thrill from Emerson, Lake and Palmer’s ‘Karn Evil 9, Part III’, but never from anything sung by Slim Dusty.

And it certainly has nothing to say about why we like music at all. That remains one of the big unsolved mysteries of the human condition. Why should any music at all ever affect us emotionally? Does it confer some evolutionarily positive survival advantage? Or is it a side-effect of some other selected-for human attribute? Or animal one? Or is it, indeed, just a fluke?

Perhaps, if there were a god, he would have given this to us as a gift.

And, for that matter, does everyone even love (some) music anyway? Are there people in the world to whom all music seems like Slim Dusty does to me? Perhaps love of music isn’t even a defining human characteristic.

Anyway, as is too often the case, the headline of the story promises something other that what the story delivers.

Posted in Music, Rant | 3 Comments

I hate proprietary disc formats

I’m testing a PVR on which you can apparently record to external hard disk drives as well as internal one. So I plug in a 1TB hard disk to test it out. Unit won’t recognised it.

Plug it into the computer. Computer (XP) won’t recognise it … or will it? The ‘Safely Remove Hardware’ dialogue knows there’s a mass storage device attached, but no disk drive number is appearing in My Computer. I open Device Manager, and there it is. I work through the ‘Troubleshooting’ items, and nothing at all useful appears.

Googling around gives a hint. Right click ‘My Computer’, select ‘Manage’, choose ‘Disk Management’. And there are the three hard drives: two internal 500GB SATA (C: and F:), and one 1,000GB one with no drive letter and no listed ‘File System’ (the other two are shown as NTFS).

Why no file system? Last time I used this drive, it was with a TV that allows you to plug in a hard drive to use for recording. But these, presumably for copyright reasons, reformat the hard disk to some weird proprietary format in order to stop people from copying the recordings back onto a TV computer. [corrected 5 March 2011]

Solution: right click the drive and choose the only option: ‘Delete Partition’. Once that was done I could click in the relevant box showing the disk drive, right click and choose ‘Format’.

Slow process (since I started typing this post, it has progressed from 1% to 9%), but hopefully the drive will be usable again when it is complete.

Moral: the PVR function on some new TVs is a useful feature indeed. But use an external disk drive that you can afford to leave dedicated to the task.

(Incidentally, I haven’t mentioned the TV brand, because I can’t remember which one it was.)

Posted in Computer, DTV | 4 Comments

Even the best can succumb to the times

The other night I stumbled across a clip on Rage of Mick Jagger performing his 1985 single ‘Just Another Night’. Even he ended up looking like a 1985 performer, with the plastered-on white face and the heavy eye liner and the heavy perming of the artificially curled hair. Some time periods are just plain embarrassing.

Mick Jagger - 1985

Posted in Music | 1 Comment

A Primer on Scientific Testing

In comments recently there has been a discussion about such things as double blind testing. I’ve recently been listening to back issues of the Skeptoid podcast, and as it happens, Episode 13 is entitled ‘A Primer on Scientific Testing’. This is a good, basic and quick overview. It’s only about seven minutes long and the 7.5MB MP3 is here.

In addition to covering single and double blinded tests, it discusses triple blinded (the people analysing the results don’t know which subjects received the ‘real’ or placebo experience or product being tested) and peer review.

If you’re into skeptical thinking, it’s worth listening to these Skeptoid podcasts, which are produced by Brian Dunning. I listen to a lot of skeptical stuff, and much of infuriates me from time to time, simply because the podcasters clearly have no understanding of economics. I’m not saying that you have to be a master of econometrics and be able to model international trade (such models are likely even less reliable than climate ones), but have a general sense of how people do actually respond to costs and benefits.

His podcast on the peak oil scare (issued in early 2008, when the price of oil was still ridiculously high, and well before the recent batch of news in which massive reserves of oil and gas are being found all over the world whenever someone pokes a stick in the ground) puts that understanding to good use. It’s here (7MB).

Posted in Mysticism, Testing | 6 Comments

Colin Whatmough: 1950-2011

I was shocked to read this morning that Colin Whatmough, the founder and owner of the Whatmough Monitors loudspeaker firm, has passed away suddenly. He was only 60.

The company produces many excellent loudspeakers and subwoofers, some of which I’ve reviewed over the years. I knew Colin only a little, having had a couple of phone conversations and, finally, sitting at the same table as him at the Sound and Image Awards presentation in 2009. He was a nice man, and extremely knowledgeable about loudspeaker design.

Australia should miss him.

Posted in Misc | 5 Comments

Bit perfect digital audio

In a comment to an earlier post, Fredrick mentioned that he had ‘read an interesting article by Chris Connaker at computeraudiophile.com. While testing Asus sound cards, he believes he has achieved bit perfect playback that still sounds awful’. A little while later jhans11 kindly provided a link to what appears to be the article Fredrick was talking about.

Here is the article. It is a review of a couple of Asus sound cards. The review is extremely detailed; admirably so. Any review can be agreed with or disagreed with. This review is so detailed that you can see pretty clearly why the reviewer made his judgements.

I disagree with at least one of those judgements, and indeed the reviewer himself is equivocal about the same thing: that is, his methodology for determining whether or not a sound card is passing through the digital audio ‘bit perfect’. He does this by plugging the coaxial digital audio output of the sound card into the digital audio input of his external DAC. This apparently supports the HDCD encoding enhancement. He feeds a digital signal with a HDCD flag into this, and sees whether the DAC properly detects the flag.

The flag is indicated by a particular pattern in the least significant bit (LSB) of the 16 bit signal (and, he says, in the LSB of 24 bit signals which surprises me, there being no point in HDCD for 24 bits).

HDCD is, essentially, a compander system although the company tends not to view it that way. If the flag is present, then the processor stretches the louder bits out so that they become louder, and the softer bits out as well, so they become softer. In other words, the dynamic range is extended beyond that available within the 16 bits of a CD. I hear they talk about it being equivalent to 20 bits of range.

What I don’t know is whether the HDCD flag is a continuing pattern in the digital signal (which would mean surrendering one bit of real resolution), or just a burst at a particular point at the start. With a reliable signal, the latter scheme should work fine.

Of course, with the latter scheme, kicking the HDCD system on says nothing about how accurately the subsequent bits are being conveyed, so let’s assume that the HDCD flag is ongoing.

The author thinks that because the HDCD flag is in the LSB, it is most susceptible to corruption, and therefore its working is a good indicator of signal integrity. Unfortunately this is analogue thinking. Mixing any noise (or dither) into the signal would certainly screw up the LSB HDCD flag. But in the digital world, each bit stands alone. At the risk of gross oversimplification, the receiving DAC collects 16 individual bits one after the other, and only then packages them together into the byte which is used to modulate the analogue output signal. But each of those 16 bits are as likely to be corrupt, or as unlikely, as any of the others. It is perfectly possible for the LSB to be intact, while several of the more significant bits aren’t.

The descriptions of the problems all point to digital audio data corruption. This could be timing: if the source device and the receiving device get out of sync, then either samples will be inserted or signal samples will be lost. But with S/PDIF as the carrier, this should not happen because the DAC slaves itself to a timing signal generated on the S/PDIF line by the source.

So I’d say the clicks indicate bytes corrupted by an incorrect bit (or bits). For them to be obvious, the bits would be in the more significant portion of the byte. (Corruption of less significant bits will be happening at the same rate, but less noticeably.)  Incidentally, a click doesn’t require much corruption at all. Open an audio file in a digital audio editor, and move one sample by, say, 25% of the full scale either up on down. Just one sample. Play it. There will be a clear click at that point.

So what’s a good way of checking whether the output of a digital audio device is bit perfect? One way would be to use a second computer with a digital audio input to record its output. Compare the original file with the newly recorded one. If they are perfect matches you know the output of the device is bit perfect.

But that presupposes that this recording computer’s sound card is bit perfect in recording. You can check this by playing a CD from the digital audio output of a CD player or DVD player into the input, recording a section. Then rip the CD and compare.

I have done this myself in the past.

Posted in Audio, Computer, How Things Work | 5 Comments

A note on my attitude

I hope I’m not coming across too strident about the cable stuff I’ve been writing about lately. Or, rather, I hope my stridency is not putting readers off.

Please feel free to disagree with me on this or any other issue. Sadly, I have had to come to realise that I am not infallible. I’m unlikely to change my mind about this issue unless and until good evidence — well conducted double blind testing, a reasonably sized group, replicated — emerges. But I’m a stickler for such things.

So argue in comments about this or other things. If you find me too frustratingly close-minded for your taste, I hope you’ll stick around anyway and continue to enjoy the bits that you may find more valuable: drilling down into some of the finer detail on how some home entertainment technology works, for example.

Meanwhile I have a copy of Luc Besson’s first movie, The Last Battle, on Blu-ray to give away. This is an interesting movie. Not a great one, but interesting and well worth watching at least once. In a way it’s a little like watching El Mariachi: noticing how this movie was made with little more than pocket money, yet still manages to be quite effective. No box, but the same as a bought one. To go to the first to ask for it in comments. Australian postal addresses only.

All other comments welcome, of course.

Posted in Admin, Blu-ray, Giveaway | 12 Comments

Wobbling grooves

Years ago I wrote a post in which I mentioned my long search for a good recording of Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor. In the end I found a Telarc one with impressive bass. I suggested in that post that:

the modulation of the groove was clearly visible during the loud bits, with (from memory) excursions up to a millimetre or so!

I had to rely on memory since by that time I had long since disposed of the LP, having replaced it with the CD version. But it turns out that I’d disposed of it by giving it to my brother, who has returned it to me.

So, a close examination of the disc shows that my memory was exaggerating. But, still, the groove modulation remains visible to the naked eye, clearly so. Here’s a photo. The scale to the right shows one millimetre notches.

The bottom C pedal at work in Bach

Now, imagine that you had a recording with such powerful bass all the way through. The way I see it, the grooves in those loud bass parts are spaced at about three per radial millimetre. You get about 75mm, measured radially, of space for a recording on a 12 inch LP. At 33 1/3 rpm, that means that a whole side with groove spacing like this would provide less that seven minutes of recording time.

And that is taking into account the RIAA Equalisation which reduces the modulation of the deep bass by up to 20 decibels. Without that, the groove spacing for the finale of this piece of music would really have been something like a full millimetre.

Posted in Analogue, Vinyl | Leave a comment