Blue Collar Writing

When you are a sole operator in any kind of business you need to be kind of a jack of all trades. So while I have the ‘dream job’ of playing with gadgets and watching movies and listening to music, occasionally I have to stop and line up a few thousand words on the computer screen, or enter a hundred receipts and invoices into a financial database, or submit to our beloved government a Business Activity Statement, along with a suitcase full of money.

Or lug stuff around, unpack it, pack it up, come up with solutions to problems.

For example, on Saturday I spent several minutes holding a 47 inch LG TV above its stand while one of my daughters worked out how to manoeuvre the lugs into place. That was after searching through all the packaging trying to find the four missing screws that would secure it. Of course, they weren’t there.

Just now I completed the two part task of packing up a pair of stereo loudspeakers. These were Usher Dancer Mini Two Diamond DMD loudspeakers. Part 1 was last night, when I spent pretty much a full hour disassembling them (they each have a massive cast iron plinth) and boxing them up. Each speaker was doubled boxed. The plinths had their own cartons. All the conical feet had to be individually wrapped.

This morning was Part 2. The two loudspeakers each had wooden plates to go onto their sides. These originally had steel straps to hold them in place, but my packing facilities aren’t quite that extreme. Instead I used plastic straps. Then I laid both of those unwieldy cardboard and wood cartons down on a pallet, squeezed the plinth cartons between them, and strapped the whole lot down. Another good half hour.

The review, incidentally, is in the current Best Buys Home Theatre, which should be out in the newsagents now.

Posted in Admin, Testing | Leave a comment

It’s nice to be right sometimes

The next issue of Sound and Image should contain my review of the Panasonic 50 inch 3DTV. In that review I wrote:

The very first TV for which I formally measured the power consumption using the international standards was the Panasonic Viera TH-50PZ700A in October 2007. That fifty inch model’s default startup mode was with a horrible ‘Dynamic’ picture setting that sucked up 550 watts. Switched to the rather better ‘Normal’ picture mode, it still used 495 watts. On today’s power usage labels that would have earned it negative 0.5 stars!

Today’s Viera TH-P50VT20A Plasma TV defaults to ‘Normal’ and uses only 181 watts by my measurement. That confirms Panasonic’s rating of four stars. On my figures, the annual power consumption would be 664kWh per year, rather than the label’s 705.

In normal viewing, as far as memory permits, I couldn’t say that it is visually any less bright for the reduced power consumption. So where has the saving been made?

Primarily in heat is my guess. The ‘neo-PDP’ technology is more efficient, so for a given brightness not as much power need be applied. In addition, it allows the cells to go darker with reasonable linearity than the technology of three years ago, so blacks don’t have to be deepened by dark glass over the face of the TV. The TV, therefore, doesn’t have to be overpowered to produce adequate brightness through the dark glass.

As a result, this TV runs mildly warm, whereas the TV from three years ago pumped great quantities of heat into the room.

I was in Myers today and was admiring the non-3D Panasonic VIErA TH-P50V20A. This is sort of a 2D version of the VT20A. However the 3D TV has had its power efficiency compromised, most likely, by the need to make certain plasma timing adjustments for 3D compatibility, so the V20A actually gets an even higher star rating: 5 stars.

I put my hand on the top, and it was noticably warm. I mean noticably literally, not euphemistically. I could feel that it was warm, but the warmth was gentle. Noticable, but not obtrusive.

So I went over to another TV they had there, last year’s 2 star rated Panasonic VIErA TH-P50V10A. Same picture (there was a whole bunch of Panasonic TVs running Toy Story in parallel.). Same apparent brightness. Put my hand on top, and it was positively blasting off the heat. I’m not sure I would have wanted to leave my hand there very long at all.

So I figure my impression and guess, mentioned above, were right.

Posted in Eco, Equipment, Testing | 1 Comment

Why do they do that?

Some years ago I reviewed Sony Minidisk deck. Nice unit, but I was confused in that it had more optical connections than it was supposed to, and fewer coaxial ones. Later it was revealed that the device I had in my hands on was the Japanese version, which was physically different to that sold in Australia.

That experience stood me in good stead a couple of years later. I had reviewed a Sony home theatre receiver, and marked it down somewhat for failing to have an on screen display. A reader wrote in, furious that I had written such a silly review. After all, he noted, there was an actual button on the actual front panel that invoked the OSD. How could I have missed that?

Indeed, how could I? As it happens, I hadn’t missed it: it hadn’t been there. The review unit was an overseas model which did lack an OSD (and its front panel button).

In the previous post I noted that I am reviewing a Sony BDP-S470  Blu-ray player. Well, that review is now aborted. I had mentioned that ‘the player is set to Region A, so I can’t run some of my usual test discs’. But this evening I have discovered that this understates the case. In fact, the player is an American one.

One of the oddities of the 50/60 hertz divide in the world is that, these days, most equipment sold in 50 hertz countries is also happy with 60 hertz content. After all, most equipment development actually takes place in 60 hertz countries (eg. South Korea, Japan and the US). But for some reason, quite a bit of equipment sold in 60 hertz countries is completely incompatible with 50 hertz signals.

And so it is with Sony. I had heard that its PS3s and Blu-ray players sold in the US do not support 50 hertz signals at all.

Tonight I popped into the Sony player my DVD-RW which carries my PAL 576i50 torture test clips, and again I got a ‘Cannot Play This Disc’ message (the previous time this had happened, I assumed it was a region code problem). Oh, oh. This wasn’t a region coded disc. It simply could not player a 50 hertz DVD. So I popped in Miss Potter Blu-ray disc. This played the Icon Home Entertainment logo fine (this is 1080p24), but when it got to the menu — which is in 50 hertz format — it just stopped playing.

This is definitely a US player. Presumably there are a lot of similarities, but how I am to know what they are?

Posted in Blu-ray, Equipment, Testing | 1 Comment

SACD comeback?

I’m presently looking at Sony’s new Blu-ray 3D player, the BDP-S470. Only $299!

As I was exploring the player’s menu system, I came across something unexpected: a facility for handling Super Audio CD playback (you can choose between CD layer where available or the SACD layer, and between the stereo and multichannel DSD content). Perhaps I’ve overlooked it, but it has been some years since I’ve seen Sony including SACD support in a product of this kind, certainly since SACD playback was dropped from the PS3 back in 2007.

It turns out that this facility also seems to be in the lower cost ($229) Sony BDP-S370.

Is Sony rehabilitating this format?

Update (12:43pm): Damn, that’s inconvenient. The player is set to Region A, so I can’t run some of my usual test discs.

Posted in Audio, Blu-ray, Equipment | 2 Comments

Cloudy with a chance of three dimensions

Yesterday Sony sent me the Blu-ray 3D version of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, last year’s animated feature. I have now done a fair bit of analysis of the disc and posted it here for those interested .

Posted in 3D, Blu-ray, Disc details | Leave a comment

File list complications?

Pixar Blu-ray discs typically have the main content spread over lots of files in order to facilitate the delivery of different on-screen text languages.

3D discs typically have multiple files to support the format. They use a regular *.m2ts file for the left eye content, and an additional *.m2ts with which, in conjunction with the left eye content, the right eye content can be generated.

So when Pixar Blu-ray 3D discs finally appear, I expect they are going have some rather complicated file lists.

Posted in 3D, BD-Live, Disc details | 1 Comment

Inception up, and Toy Story 3 down a little

Christopher Nolan’s new movie, Inception, has opened in the US and starts on IMDB at 9.4/10, and position #3 with a weighted 9.1/10. More than 72% of the nearly 30,000 voters so far have given it 10/10.

For some reason, TV reports about the movie note that Nolan made the two recent Batman movies, but don’t mention the lineage of Nolan’s mind-benders of which this movie would appear to be the culmination: Following, Memento, and The Prestige.

Meanwhile, Toy Story 3 seems to be settling down after it’s early massive score. It is now at 9.0 on the front page, and 8.8 on the Top 250.

Posted in Cinema | 2 Comments

Perhaps Not So Evil Monster (Formerly: Evil Monster)

In my last post I issued a tepid condemnation of Monster Cables’ litigation practices. This evening I followed a link in the show notes for Dave Hitt’s podcast to get a sense of how much Monster Cables seems to be focused on trademark litigation. The link he gave didn’t seem to work beyond page 1, so here’s a slightly different link to a list from the US Patents and Trademarks Office of trademark disputes in which Monster Cables is usually the plaintiff. As it says on the top of the page, when I conducted a search with ‘Monster Cables’ as the ‘Party’, ‘Number of results: 100+’.

Amongst the products and uses Monster Cables has sued over: Monster Boys Club, Monster Fleece, Monster Wheelbarrow (these three from page 10), Monster Energy (from a beverage company, so I guess we’re talking a drink, p.11), the Discovery Channel TV show ‘Monster Garage‘ (p.12), the PS2 game ‘War of the Monsters‘, and even a Scooby-Doo cartoon that dared to have ‘Monster’ in its title  (both p.16).

I’ve got to say, all this stuff makes me want to tell anyone interested in high-end cables that, even if they believe that they offer some benefit, they should choose a brand that doesn’t sue TV shows for using a common word.

I shall draw these two posts to the attention of the Australian distributor for Monster Cables — a company, incidentally, that distributes some truly fine audio equipment — and post what response it may have.

Update (12:24pm):

Thanks to my brother, I now have more info, and have accordingly changed the title to this post. On the evidence, it seems that Monster Cable seems for the most part to be vigorously engaging in rather distasteful corporate activity, rather than being the spawn of the devil. And if you can believe the company’s main man, it is required to do this because of various government rules.

His response to earlier accusations is here. I delved a little further into the US Patents and Trademarks Office’s database, specifically, the Scooby-Doo dispute. In that one it turns out that the Scooby-Doo makers were trying to have the title to their video release granted trademark status. Monster apparently opposed this, and the Office finally rejected the claim (technically, Hanna-Barbera Productions ‘voluntarily’ abandoned the claim after being told by the office that it wouldn’t get the trademark). Sensibly, the law does not permit a trademark to be granted to a single work.

Nonetheless, there does seem to be quite a bit of overreach. See, for example, this response by Blue Jeans Cables to a cease-and-desist from Monster Cables.

Update 2 (2:30pm):

An interesting post here — unverified, so take with a grain of salt, although it conforms to my own biases — indicating that listeners could not hear any difference between Monster speaker cables and straightened and soldered wire coathangers (go to the last big paragraph).

A better way into the Blue Jeans Cable response to Monster’s Cease and Desist and cough up money letter is via Blue Jeans’ own website, because there you can also see Monster’s original demand.

Having a little look around its website, Blue Jeans Cable seems to be a rather good business. It sells cables, of course, but at prices that seem quite reasonable. It also seems pretty knowledgeable, with a bunch of informative and accessible articles on cable issues. It seems to completely avoid any form of mysticism in its descriptions and discussions.

Finally, as far as I could find, there appears to have been no response to Blue Jeans Cable’s forthright rejection — over two years ago — to Monster Cables’ claims. That would raise the suspicion that Monster Cables knew its claims to be without merit at the time of sending the letter. If so, that would tend to nudge the company, in my view, a little closer to the ‘evil’ end of the continuum.

Posted in Cables, Mysticism, Rant | 8 Comments

Monsters and High Definition

I’ve previously mentioned the Quick Hitts podcast a couple of times. Dave Hitt has a superbly professional manner and tone in his podcasts on his wide ranging, but generally fairly libertarian subjects. I find a great deal to agree with in his podcasts.

There was one I just listened to this evening, though, to which I think I must take exception. It wasn’t the podcast proper, but more the letter he read out, and his evident agreement, regarding the pointlessness of high definition video, and a slightly over-the-top dismissal of Monster Cable. Download podcast ‘Unintended Consequences’ from this page. Actually, download them all because they make great listening.

First, though, I learned from this podcast that Monster really has been guilty of some horrible behaviour, suing people most aggressively over claimed trademark infringement in a way I think is quite disgusting, and taking a quote from a negative review and reproducing it out of context in its advertising to make it seem positive.

I have my own issues with overpriced cables, and I always recommend against them, including Monster’s products, unless the money is clearly a trivial matter to the would-be purchaser.

Having said all that, back in the early 1980s the company did a valuable surface: it raised public awareness of an issue well-known to audio enthusiasts. That is, that most ‘speaker cable’ was crap. It was all incredibly thin in those days, and if you had for whatever reason a long run, you could easily chew up several per cent of the output power of your amplifier just in the resistance in the cable. Even before that, of course, audio enthusiasts didn’t use ‘speaker cable’. They tended to use twin core power cable, which had much lower resistance.

Since then, a valuable early idea has been perverted, both by Monster itself (with interconnects, which are nowhere near as important to sound quality, and digital cables), and even more so by other so-called audiophile cable makers. As I keep saying, for analogue interconnects, look for something in the $20 range, with good moulded plugs and gold plating (to resist corrosion, and for no other reason), and thickish wires (which indicate proper shielding). For speaker cables I buy the stuff from Dick Smith that sells for about $5 a metre. It’s very thick and very low in resistance.

As to general audio quality, one of the remarks on Dave’s podcast was to the effect that someone’s computer speakers sounded fine. And that’s fine for that person. I have nothing against it, even though I personally prefer more accurate reproduction of the sound, including all its elements. Somehow I doubt that a typical computer system will generate the 16 hertz fundamental of Bach’s Passacaglia and Fugue in C Minor when played on a mighty pipe organ.

As for HD, there was some mention of programs not being worth watching if one can spare the attention to notice the smaller details. But what if those smaller details are part of the story? See, for example, John Travolta’s face in the Blu-ray version of Pulp Fiction, compared to the DVD version:

Is the ‘door room’ scene of Monsters, Inc. (somehow, this seemed an appropriate title to compare, seeing as how Monster Cable tried to sue over the title) pleasant to look at on DVD when all the detail mushes up into confusion?

DVDs were great when we had 30 inch CRT TVs. Now we have 50 inch plasmas or LCD TVs, or even 85 or 100 inch front projection screens, Blu-ray and HDTV make the difference between an enjoyable experience, and one in which your eyes are being made tired by either a soft, out of focus image, or one with ugly artefacts of edge enhancement technology.

When HDTV was being introduced into Australia about eight years ago, a prominent commentator launched a campaign against it on the basis that real HDTVs were going to cost $20,000. And he was right … at the time. But as with every technology that achieves mass acceptance, prices fell.

The other day I reviewed a 50 inch Panasonic plasma TV. Full HD. 3DTV support. Glorious picture quality — the best yet, I think. Multimedia playback from USB, SD and DLNA network. Internet portal through to YouTube videos and Picasa photos, plus a number of Web gizmos and room for expansion. Four star energy rating (which I confirmed). Pretty much the best plasma that the best plasma company has to offer: $3,300.

And this time next year, that will seem expensive.

I didn’t try to talk people into buying HDTV and Blu-ray if players when full HD was available only from a $40,000 front projector, or when Blu-ray players were $2,200. But now, in part thanks to the early adopters and enthusiasts, I do. Because the improvement isn’t a subtle imaginary thing, but blindingly obvious on a larger screen.

Australian residents who have persisted this far: I have Luc Besson’s 1988 movie, The Big Blue, available on Blu-ray. No box, no slick, but the real thing. Disc has both the 168 minute Director’s Cut, and the 137 minute Theatrical version, plus a 97 minute SD documentary. First to ask for it in comments gets it.

Posted in Blu-ray, Giveaway, HDTV, Rant, Value | 4 Comments

Digital Radio in Canberra!

My brother emails me:

The trial of DAB+ began on Wednesday. I tuned my radio in last night and despite it being a low powered test signal I had good reception.

The stations available are:

  • MIX 106.3
  • MIX 106.3 PLUS
  • My Canberra Digital
  • RADAR RADIO
  • SBS Radio 1
  • SBS Radio 2
  • 104.7-HIT MUSIC
  • 2CA
  • 2CC
  • Hot Country

Thanks for that. Weird: no ABC.

It won’t work in my office (metal insulation makes it a bugger for reception), but much to my surprise I get a borderline signal in the back yard (with dropouts). When they have proper signal strength, I might even get it in the office.

Posted in Digital Radio | 2 Comments